Task 2: Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many countries? What should be done to increase cycling?
While bicycles are considered the most environmentally-friendly means of transportation, the use of such underrated vehicles has not been gaining much attention in civilized countries. This essay will not only discuss the various factors that silent the appearance of cycling in developed areas, but the elaboration on ways to combat this phenomenon will also be made.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why only a small percentage of citizens would consider cycling worthwhile. In a busy society, many people devote a significant proportion of their time to working and entertaining. Since bicycles are such fragile and slow vehicles, their use daily would be too inefficient for heavy workloads. Moreover, cycling is labor-intensive, as the only source of fuel is mostly human’s muscle strength and capacity. As a result, there is no denying that a considerable percentage of commuters seem to choose cars, motorcycles, or even public transport for consistent navigation.
On the other hand, the government can take some measures to positively evaluate cycling, and the use of bicycles in general. One of the most obvious approaches would be the taxation not only on fossil fuels but also on vehicles that explicitly promote fuels that damage the environment. As a result, many people would prioritize cycling, since owning other vehicles would affect their expenses. Besides, the construction of lanes specifically for cyclists would also be helpful for those who personally take cycling seriously. With this development, not only will the traffic system become more flexible, but the environment will also be respectfully handled.
In conclusion, it is a shame that the use of cycling in developed countries is deemed unpopular regardless of how much it contributes to the environment. However, that does not justify the fact that bicycles would be able to receive the necessary attention they deserve.
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 73
- We were given two diagrams showing Darwin city waterfront in 2009 and after the 2014 reconstruction We had to compare and describe both of them 78
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s lives and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs Do you agree or disagree 67
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage of the natural environment what are the causes and possible solutions 61
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the necessary attention they deserve.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, in general, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2036004051 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6060642159 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.357142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183998695039 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601294716118 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308620695056 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11237493347 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01110443462 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.