It is insisted that increasing the manufacture of products annually ought to be the aim of every nation. While it is true that could should increase their capacity of producing products to satisfy peoples' needs I belive that this can lead to the decline in the quality of goods as well as requires plenty of nations' resources.
On the one hand, I accept that if there were sufficient amount of goods on the markets their cost would be low. As populations of countries are increasing and likely to peak in the near future, governments should aim at producing adequate amount of goods to ensure that citizens can afford to purchase them. Otherwise, demand can surpass supply, cauising disruptions in the supply chain. Moreover, more jobs can be created in factories to produce goods and materials which can result in a growth in employment. From this perspective, nations should focus on rising the production scopes so that everybody can access to products at a reasonble price.
On the other hand, I feel that it is rather unconceivable to expand the production of gooda every year. First, not all countries are able to invest in the manufacture of growing amount of goods. Factories in these countries are not equipped with modern technology, which can help to achieve that goal. These factories should be provided with some finance to replace their outdated equipments, which most countries often lack. Another reason might be tgat even if some developed countries can succeed in their goals, mass production of goods seems to reduce their quality. As a result, although they might be cost-efficient, the public might not be satisfied by the low quality of products they buy.
In conclusion, I disagree to a small extent that countries should concentrate on the qauntity of goods and I argue that it is more logical to improve their quality.
- People in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs and at an increasingly early age Some sociologist claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example Discuss the causes and 61
- Nowadays people are able to use the internet to do an increasing number of tasks Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012
- As children become adults their social behaviour changes in some ways What are the main differences between young children s social behaviour and that of adults To what extent are the changes that take place good 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, well, while, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98387096774 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7296670504 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525806451613 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3773556746 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268387207418 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904450053431 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457724943288 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17043250535 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106651467862 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.