Task 2: In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
Some people think the Internet have gradually replaced the internet the face-to-face conversation, and it is possible to work, shop or chat with friends from home without meeting in the real life. In my opinion, this is the negative development and I will prove my viewpoints in this essay below.
Despite the fact that the internet improves the life quality and makes the daily life of people become more convenient, it still has negative effects on some aspects. Actually, reducing making the direct conversations can increase the loneliness and make the relationship become more distant. One obvious example is the meeting of former classmates who are no longer meet each other day-to-day after leaving school. Due to the busyness and the pressure work, many people keep in touch with their friends by chatting online and rarely arrange time to have the face-to-face meetings. As the result, it leads to the sparse chats and people may feel empty and realise that they are gradually losing contact with society.
Furthermore, in some case, the direct communication is more effective. It is true that the critical decisions should be discussed by face-to-face negotiation. For instance, the contracts require the actual signatures from parties involved and online meeting can not replace negotiating directly. One more example is buying shoes online, which the products may be damaged during delivery. Meanwhile, people may have the practical experience at retail stores about material, quality and fit of the shoes before deciding to make a payment.
In conclusion, although internet is more and more widely used globally, I personally believe that it cannot replace the face-to-face communication in the daily life of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | minhphambinh1234 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | cinderel | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- Task 2 In many countries today people buy a range of household goods TV microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of self employed workers of the total workforce in five countries in 1998 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- TASK 2 The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Task 2 In many countries today people buy a range of household goods TV microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 56
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, if, may, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32363636364 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80223287592 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592727272727 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4308536901 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290604702171 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908899333227 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922745450349 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185953800074 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100244215408 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.