Task 2: Some believe that because everyone needs a place to live, governments should provide houses for those who are too poor to afford their own. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether to provide houses for the poor by the government is very topical today, as so many people are struggling with the worries about a place to live. However, I personally do not entirely accept this, and I will explain why in this essay.
We must consider the potential negatives of placing a burden on the finances of the government. The authorities have to face a number of investments in public services such as schools, hospitals, or infrastructures. Therefore, if they need to spend a huge amount of money to build shelters for just the small parts of countries, the financial economy will be severely impaired. A further reason to be wary of this idea is the lack of motivation. In order to have their own houses for themselves, it is necessary to work hard and save money until they earn enough properties. When the government provides the available houses for the poor, they lose the motivation to put effort into their work and seemly become dependent on the authorities.
However, it is admitted that giving houses for the needed people is the best to ensure safety. Natural calamities are unpredictable, so it is immensely dangerous for those who do not have shelters. In this situation, the government just should provide temporary public houses for the short term to save people in emergency conditions as well as continuing encourage them to build their own houses early.
In conclusion, I am convinced that providing free houses for poor people is not totally a good idea. Boosting citizens to construct their houses is not only a buffet against lack of motivation but also ensures safety for the long term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-04 | phuongquynh79 | 91 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
- The three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1992 and 2001
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether to provide houses for the poor by the g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88571428571 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80833308101 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3302374189 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.230769231 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278169070828 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916305581082 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630688411256 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172818273852 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041057565268 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.