People have different views about whether they should producers and supermarkets should have the responsibility to decline the number of packing of goods. While some have a preference for users should avoid buying a product with numerous packing, I firmly believe that the goods should be cut down by factors.
On the one hand, there are several good reasons why people tend to think that customers should limit buying goods much covering. Firstly, users should have a responsibility for limiting of consumption of products that are packaged in hard-to-decompose materials. They could use cloth bags for shopping due to recycling and does not harm the environment. In addition, the individual could contribute to companies such as sending a letter of complaint or consumers could put pressure on these companies to change attitudes towards the materials of packaging.
Turning to the other side of the argument, I am more in favor of companies should decrease the amount of packaging of products. Obviously, consumers have little awareness of the bad effects of products packaged. In fact, producers and supermarkets should reduce the packaging of goods, instead of using biodegradable or recycling. In addition, some people cannot afford to be selective about which products they buy. For example, elderly people who couldn't walk, but rely on relatives to buy for them, will not know about the harmful effects of product packaging, which is a further reason why all companies need to be more responsible.
All things considered, although it is often believed that users should limit buying covering for goods, I am convinced that companies should have responsibilities for the market.
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Task 2 Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both the views and give your opi 61
- The personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organizations Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The table chart show the population of New Zealand between 2011 and 2012 67
- The given graph shows the nitrogen oxide emissions produced by four vehicles 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ey buy. For example, elderly people who couldnt walk, but rely on relatives to buy for ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30223880597 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95615421433 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3617850584 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278984513754 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108396794737 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765025458769 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176464274943 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699860989851 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.