Task 2: Today, TV channels provide man’s sport shows more than women’s sports shows, why? Should TV channels give equal time to women’s sport and men’s sport?
Sports programs for men have indeed dominated those of their counterparts on television in recent years. There could be several explanations for this trend, and I believe that TV channels should not change the amount of time for these shows.
There are two main reasons why man’s sports shows are broadcast more frequently on television. Firstly, there are a few options for TV programs that men can choose. While women could enjoy a wide range of different selections, such as a series of drama and talent contests, men’s choices may be restricted to sports events. Therefore, it is understandable that the amount of time showing man’s sports programs is much higher. Secondly, men are likely to have a keen interest in sports than women. Since men could have much leisure time to watch a whole sport session, they could entirely enjoy the show without any interruptions. Whereas, female audiences may have to do household chores and listen to TV channels simultaneously, which makes them resort to a more auditory program such as a talk show or a music competition.
In my opinion, TV channels should maintain the current schedules of showing sports programs for both genders. I believe that the frequency and variety of each mentioned show should be measured according to the actual preference of audiences. If TV broadcasters tried to balance the time of sports shows for men and women, they would cut down on either time for men’s sports programs or women’s other shows. By doing this, the specific number of viewers on a particular program tends to reduce. As a result, the profits of these channels would be diminished, which leads to limited budgets for other programs on television. In this sense, both media agencies and audiences may suffer from dissatisfaction since their needs could not be met. Hence, as long as there is no complaint from TV viewers, the broadcast of sports events should remain unchanged.
In conclusion, I believe that there are rationales behind the decision of more on-air man’s sports shows; therefore, this should be maintained.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | kieutrangkg1 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | ngoc071003 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | nora2001 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | Thu Ha 12345 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-26 | haphuongpham49 | 56 | view |
- The table demonstrates the number of five different kinds of vehicles that had licenses in Australia in three years 2010 2012 and 2014 89
- Task 2 Today TV channels provide man s sport shows more than women s sports shows why Should TV channels give equal time to women s sport and men s sport 73
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'sport'.
Suggestion: sport
...sts, men’s choices may be restricted to sports events. Therefore, it is understandable...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09329446064 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76749952586 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527696793003 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6728567918 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.764705882 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454520124553 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157371207206 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104497869964 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275855517057 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108964089277 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.