Teachers used to convey information, but now with wide resources of information, there is no role for teachers to play in modern education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recent years have witnessed an increase in the proportion of autonomous learning, raising many questions of teachers’ essence. Given that learning through alternative sources of information could be fraught with pitfalls, teachers could not be replaced in modern education.
On the one hand, there are many benefits when it comes to studying by alternative resources of information. First, Cloud-learning is invariably associated with the deficiency of effective practice and oversaturation of abstract knowledge. This is proved to act as the deterrent for students from comprehending the lessons, thereby losing their passion on learning. Second, learning through the Internet correlates with the higher degree of distractions stemming from other online materials such as notifications and messages of social networks or online pop-up advertisements. This is a catalyst for lower level of learning concentrations, preventing students from making progress.
On the other hand, it should be acknowledged that the replacement of teachers in educational system ought to be discouraged. First, only teachers could understand the strengths and weaknesses in students’ potential academic capacity. Therefore, they would devise the most effective teaching methods based on the students’ needs, fueling their academic attainments. In addition, compared with robot teachers, only teachers could organize many team-work activities, incentivising interaction and consultation among class members.
In conclusion, due to many disadvantages associated with self-learning from alternative information sources, it is highly recommended against the replacement of teachers in modern education. Official authorities should offer more teacher training programs in educational institutions to guarantee the best teaching quality for students in the long-term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-04 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
| 2017-08-03 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Millions of dollar are spent on space research each year. Some people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on earth. Do you agree or disagree ? 89
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful Architects shouldn t worry about producing building as a work of art Do you agree or disagree 63
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty society is also guilty of committing murder Therefore life in prison is a better punishment for murderers To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 88
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.28515625 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41439098463 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7786524037 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174115305354 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602580301983 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384486306728 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109564426044 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027669741241 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.2 12.4159519038 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.