Technology has developed very fast in the past 100 years. However, some people think that technological progress has brought negative effects on humanity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is considered by some that the rapid development of technology over the last decade has resulted in an adverse impact on human life. While I agree that advanced technology has led to several disadvantages to some extent, I would argue that its positive side is greater.
On the one hand, there are some consequences arising out of technological progress. First, since a growing number of people, especially youngsters, have been more dependent on technology, more people might less likely participate in vital physical activities. For example, children addicted to online games are not really fond of outside activities. This tendency makes them more prone to the risk of developing some forms of diseases such as obesity and diabetes. Second, using social media namely Facebook and Twitter to replace face to face contact and communication in person could diminish human relation in real life. If people spend their time on social networks excessively, they might feel the sense of alienation.
On the other hand, the evaluation of technology undoubtedly facilitates the way people live these days. The first benefit is thanks to the internet connection and mobile technology, people find it easy to keep in contact with people who are some distance away. For instance, parents in Vietnam just need to pick up their smartphones to make a video call via the Facebook app in order to get in touch with their children studying overseas. Additionally, cutting-edge inventions positively influence a broad spectrum of vital sectors. This is exemplified by the advancement in medical technology in which robots can carry out surgeries which are more precise than ever before.
In conclusion, while there are some negative effects which are believed to be caused by technological process, I support the view that it has more beneficial impacts on humanity.
- it is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think it is more important for the government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- High school students are usually not good at managing money. What are the reasons? What are the solutions? 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 81
- People Believe That A Crime Is A Result Of Social Problems And Poverty, Others Think That Crime Is A Result Of Bad Person's Nature. Discuss And Give Your Opinion? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23825503356 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8904385353 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634228187919 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1278445063 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205075547593 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677723603799 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626004105258 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136270266709 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454727005367 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.