Technology has taken control of some peoples’ lives. We should try to take control of technology. Give your opinion.
Nowadays, technology in a different level of our life has an important role, but some people believe that we should control technology in our lives, and we would be better have a balanced life. In the following paragraphs, I am going to discuss this issue, and give some details about my opinion.
On the one hand, we live in technology century, and we have to use different methods or tools that depend on technology. On the other hand, for some people technology is important whereas they follow new technology and they are techie person.
In some countries especially developed countries technology overcome on peoples’ life even in simple usages and people are becoming addicted to it, but I think it would be better we have a balanced plan in our life for using of technology, while many people believe that without it we cannot do some tasks.
However, in some parts of our life, we have to use new inventions, tools, and technology mainly because one part of our life will be complete with the theme. Therefore, sometimes it is unavoidable. Some statistics show that more than half of people in the world use more than 4 hours in a day of technology in their daily time. The obvious example is; smartphone.
To conclude, by technology our life would be more convince and efficiency rather than without it. The main point is that people should try to use it normally, and it does not control their life.
- One day the worlds’ oil and gas reserve will run out. The search for alternative energy sources like wind power, solar power, burning waste, and power are causing as much environmental manage as the oil and nuclear power sources they are intended to rep 73
- Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies while other argue that robots might have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 84
- The bar chart shows a survey of a group of young professional aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 91
- Technology has taken control of some peoples’ lives. We should try to take control of technology. Give your opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8016194332 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66069843584 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5472772612 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.818181818 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317752412478 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113788676159 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846712573428 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188923199917 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657273078176 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.