Technology is responsible for unemployment.
Agree or disagree?
As the world is stepping into a new era, technological innovations are the inspiration boosting the economy. However, some claim that these advancements are the culprit of joblessness. In my opinion, I partly favor that statement.
On the one hand, there are many compelling reasons that the labor market is gradually undermined by modern device and equipment innovations. This is exemplified by the fact that artificial intelligence is the core key to many monopolistic firms taking full advantage of upgraded machinery rather than paying for human working effort. For instance, chat GBT is a noticeable software which could effortlessly perform many coding tasks that computer programmers do in longer times. Another point to consider is that some labor-intensive jobs such as domestic help and weaver which are negatively affected by technology expansions. To illustrate, while staff income is more expensive than the cost of working machines which can carry out all of these jobs without tiring, many replacements such as automated vacuum cleaners and robotic arms with productive, stabilization and precision would be prioritized by most owners, triggering the rising rate of unemployment.
On the other hand, most unemployed people are attributable to themselves which plays a vital role in their failure. In terms of personal ability, they lack academic knowledge or vocational training which is mainly required in almost all occupations, leading to wasting their working opportunity. As well as many blue-collar jobs which are related to mechanical manufacture could be replaced by automated technology in the future, threatening employees. As a matter of fact, it is imperative that governments implement some policies about educational programs, increasing the intellectual level in order to cultivate many qualified workers about the technological side in the modern period. Consequently, more white-collar employees who are suitable with company demand, enroll in the labor market as well as improve the jobless issues in particular.
The implication of this is that unemployment does not only rely on technological advancements but also due to personal skills. The authorities play a crucial role in stopping these problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | phamkhuyen | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-11 | MEBC Class | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in particular, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61470588235 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19979859877 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629411764706 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2040461245 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.266666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109277204398 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344538399976 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382332083804 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692135840688 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226168065745 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.