In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Due to the increasement of brands and the new tendency of customers in recent days, companies have to develop their products to be more suitable and more attracted with buyers.From my point of view, I believe it is a negative development.
The reason of the way production of products is to enhance one strength in businesses' items and make that strength to be unique. Otherwise, their products will be decent and less attractive than other brands. For example, IPhone always showed as the fastest and most convenient phone in the world because their OS is unique and easy for beginners such as elder to utilize, and so their design. People's curiosity for fasciating and bizarre items now are new tendency.
However, if businesses take huge care of strength and ignore the weakness of their products , they will receive the bad rate from users and it affects the income of companies. In addition, a number of businesses are lies to customers about the quality of items through advertising. Take McDonald as an example, in their advertising video. The hamburger is fresher and more scrumptious than reality. It is a fact that those companies that make unrealistic advertising video will change customer's attitude to their items detrimentally.
In conclusion, Businesses before present their products have to understand about customer psychology and be honest with them.
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...suitable and more attracted with buyers.From my point of view, I believe it is a neg...
^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nd ignore the weakness of their products , they will receive the bad rate from use...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14798206278 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85969473093 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57399103139 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9757271758 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.363636364 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25471993035 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932905135393 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455414879624 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152473887023 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177163379682 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.