There are more and more effective security measures in large cities to reduce the crime. Does this endeavour bring more benefits than problems?
Nowadays, the governments in large cities are becoming more aware of the significant rise in the crime rate that the need for applying measures to protect their citizens is far more urgent than ever. Along with a great deal of advantages that those methods have brought to us, the disadvantages are also being taken serious.
With the growth of security acts by the governments, people are now getting irritated as they have intruded upon the public's privacy. For instance, applying security devices such as the CCTV systems has brought such a relief to the governments' concerns, yet, they are now threatening the daily activities of normal people. Many of us, in a way, would fear of not being allowed to freely do what we want without being watched. In addition, the greater number of police force in the streets have clearly limited our sense of freedom that every activity are now being watched and scrutinized, which leave no comfortability to the residents.
On the other hand, leaving out all of the drawbacks, such anti-crime equipments have already done good in providing safety for cities. Firstly, the police would find it easier to spot criminals acts thanks to the help of the surveillance cameras. As a result, the crime rate can eventually reduce as crimes are now fear of being caught by their careless plans on harming people. Secondly, these methods has also raised a sense of safety among people that they know they will be protected all day long. People would, therefore, could leave worries for their governments and enjoy their lives.
In conclusion, although some might feel uncomfortable with so much measures against crimes for privacy reasons, it is high time that they were carried out well and carefully for the better quality of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-25 | ashkan zaheri | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...rritated as they have intruded upon the publics privacy. For instance, applying securit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...idents. On the other hand, leaving out all of the drawbacks, such anti-crime equipments h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worries about'?
Suggestion: worries about
...g. People would, therefore, could leave worries for their governments and enjoy their lives...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...h some might feel uncomfortable with so much measures against crimes for privacy rea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96959459459 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58388970932 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601351351351 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.115943785 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123035298967 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420958355112 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830955519994 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847461223757 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858963925811 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.