These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace.
Are there more advantages or dis advantages to this situation?
Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
The cooperation between employees belonging to two separate generations has seen a considerable rise in recent years. In spite of all arguments to the contrary, I would contend that this approach has brought significant achievements to workplaces.
First of all, having passed the initial stages of work, the old generations are enough experienced to offer some useful advice. Indeed, they have faced a wide variety of challenges leading to more understanding of the vitality of consultation, planning and patience which can be passed to younger colleagues. Never could this personal knowledge be expressed unless by interactive methods one of which is team work. It is apparent that had face to face communications been limited, the youth would have devoted a vast amount of time and energy to get equivalent experiments. However, it should be noticed that the benefit of mixing is not restricted to young staff.
Equally importantly, though, the enthusiasm of new comers as a defining characteristic, would bring more motivation to the workplace. Their fresh mind and inclination to create a niche culminate in innovative ideas and planes revolutionizing the company’s status. Spreading all over the workplace, this feature has a positive impact on all employees regardless to their age and as a result, on atmosphere. Imagine the laziness that would appear if young people were eliminated from workplaces, this would definitely have detrimental effects on business, furthermore.
By way of conclusion, both young and old employees are an asset to a company benefiting from their collaboration and sharing strengths.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | fereshtehlot | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 84
- These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace.Are there more advantages or dis advantages to this situation?Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 61
- the urban transport system receives more funds compared to the rural transport system.why do you think is so?how can it be solved? 78
- Everybody should expect to have more than one career these days To what extend do you agree or disagree 59
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...ng is not restricted to young staff. Equally importantly, though, the enthusiasm of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, as a result, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4880952381 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24884178056 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654761904762 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3789732214 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12088597869 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399999606021 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223492715448 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.06330476056 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256099176358 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.