The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear energy overweigh the disadvantages. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.
Nuclear power can be harnessed as an instrument to remain global peace and supply humankind as a low-cost and safe source of energy, which is believed that offer more merits than risks. I completely agree with this statement. The justifications for this belief will be elaborated below.
It is understandable why some people do not advocate to the use of nuclear energy. The first rationale is that political leaders who are war enthusiasts would actually encourage to deploy weapons with nuclear war-headed missiles or bombs in unnecessary situations. This may soon escalate to a total war among major powers and finally result in the vast destruction of the planet. Furthermore, there is a chance that nuclear weapons could fell into the hands of terrorists, those are likely to use them in order to harm innocent citizens. An additional point is that nuclear power if not managed properly would place humans and habitats at a great risk of damage. To illustrate, explosion of a nuclear power plant in Ukraine took lives of hundreds of people and cost billions of dollars to retain safety for nearby regions. Thus, the pitfalls of nuclear energy may be the reasons why it is not widely exploited globally.
However, these thinkings are flawed as public awareness has been raised and with advent of technology in the nuclear field, there are less possibility that nuclear war-heads are deployed and production of nuclear powers are safer than ever. Even though there are some researches on stronger weapons such as heated bombs, yet nuclear weapons are of primary important to maintain the balance of the world. The authorities of would consider carefully consequences before conducting a war against other nations or the nations’ allies that armed with the highly-damaged weapons. Similarly, there are no viable alternatives for nuclear energy for the time being. Water, wind, waves generated energy are not capable of producing large volume with controlled amount of energy as nuclear power. More importantly, with its low-cost manufacture and limited waste, production of energy from nuclear power is more efficient than other forms of processing energy.
In sum, nuclear arms could be used by criminals and misuse of energy power could cause great threat to the public. However, the position of weapons and energy made by nuclear is vital for the development of human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-17 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 84
- Giving detailed descriptions of crimes in newspapers and on TV can have negative consequences so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'deploying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: deploying
...ar enthusiasts would actually encourage to deploy weapons with nuclear war-headed missile...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, similarly, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17054263566 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72385741332 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571059431525 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9813519567 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383441128019 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12393634628 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06910088948 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235045559643 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764428116191 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.