Throughout history, people have dreamed of living in a perfect society, but they have not agreed on what an ideal society would be like.
What do you think is the most important element of a perfect society in the modern world?
How can people work towards achieving an ideal society?
Each person holds different views on how an ideal society should be. Personally, I opine that pure altruism plays the most paramount factor. This essay will analyze the reasons for my opinion and several approaches will be provided to achieve this.
To commence with, a fundamental reason for this is that the origins of issues stem from the selfishness of humans. In other words, people overvalue money, in lieu of human bonds, giving rise to deleterious implications such as defying everything to achieve goals. Global warming is a good case in point. Dwellers have cut a large number of trees, regardless of government’s legislation, for the sake of farming or selling logs illegally to make profits. While they perceive that trees make a huge contribution to deter environmental degradation by releasing oxygen and sucking carbon dioxide. Therefore, if people put others first, matters will not be serious and can be coped with.
To attain this ideal society, there are several steps that should be taken into account. The first and foremost measure is that innovating the early education of children, the master of the world. A sense of altruism emerges during childhood and can be developed through years of schooling. Thereby parents, accompanied by teachers should teach them sharing and giving from an early age. In addition, the government had better have several policies, namely building more schools even in godforsaken areas, enhancing the quality of teachers, establishing organizations for helping poor people, and so on. That can generate opportunities for both givers and takers. Thus, the partnership between authorities and residents can create an ideal society.
In conclusion, to reach an ideal society in which pure altruism is the main key, we should focus on nurturing the education of the next generation and undertaking strategies of the government
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-01 | hieuasroma@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | watermelon.linh | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-14 | Hương Giang | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | panizzf | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 63
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...a good case in point. Dwellers have cut a large number of trees, regardless of government’s legis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31772575251 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84907827387 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658862876254 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0708784366 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5294117647 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164309426127 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464353019415 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447992976561 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955948494349 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013267879427 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.