Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home.
Is this a positive or negative development?
The rapid pace of the artificial intelligence evolution has seen progress in manufacturing and upgrading robots to remove human’s drudgery. Its work efficiency has also been proven by its excellence and productivity with a wide range of applications from household purposes to the workplaces. I would contend that this is a positive development to some degree.
Firstly, machinery outperforms human in many perspectives including working. For one thing, information could be stored at a data center, which directly results in a spacious workspace and a decline in conventional paper-based statistics and files. Since offices are often overwhelmed with tons of paper, robots could store and adjust documents in a logical way as well as retrieve them in a fraction of second. For another, automation could improve the quality at work as the accuracy of algorithm is able to counter all the issues such as wrong calculation due to the lack of concentration by human or tracking information when clients call for help. Both of the aforementioned benefits are essential to businesses during their operation and adaptation to the needs of the market.
In the context of home, these revolutionary inventions are also available in domestic use. For instance, culinary robots are designed to collect ingredients and follow the recipes to provide families with a well-prepared meal, which could save time for the housewife to do other tasks. Furthermore, there are also automatic house cleaners and dishwashers that have been ubiquitous these days and thanks to those devices, the living standard of people has been improved very much. The adults can spend time for their children in tandem with relieving themselves from the tiresome work after a long day whereas kids could concentrate fully on their studies without worrying about household chores.
To conclude, there are ample benefits when applying robotic technology to real life. This transition is changing people’s attitudes as well as positively intervening in the function of mankind.
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly but most patients do not follow an exercise routine Why do you think this happens How can people be encouraged to exercise regularly 89
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others argue that happiness depends on different factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Economic growth in recent years made some people in both developed countries and developing countries richer However research shows that while people in developing countries are happier people in developed countries seem not happier than before What does 11
- Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a positive development to some degree. Firstly, machinery outperforms human in ...
^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a logical way" with adverb for "logical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...robots could store and adjust documents in a logical way as well as retrieve them in a fraction ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adaptation to the needs of the market. In the context of home, these revolution...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thout worrying about household chores. To conclude, there are ample benefits wh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, so, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4125 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01997904587 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640625 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5964614314 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157706101602 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479458166778 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483868076503 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858323712459 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225223563727 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.