today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays in open business environment there are a lot of people believe that the high sales of common consumer goods indicate the power of advertising and not the true needs of society in which they are sold. To be honest I agree with this issue and this essay below will analyze virtually about this.
To begin with, theoretically the goods can be categorized into two types are necessary and not the real needs. In particular, the useful commodities are easy to sell in every sale systems even private store and briskly receive a lucrative money. Because of these reasons, the daily using categories become popular everywhere. Unlike, not the real needs products are rarely performed in the store just incase an expert store. Generally, these items are just produced in a small number.
Remarkably, we are unaccepted the power of the advertising in business. For instance, advertising is one of the most crucial role to sale commodities in a lot of companies today. They pour a huge of funding into introducing their products to the consumers easier by television, internet, radios and papers. Formerly, a best qualified commodities are just speared by mouth, so the business sphere becomes to restrict. Nowadays if a normal products have a right adversiting plan it will become succesful but in return it will decline with a good commodities lack of advertising. In addition, the advertising is the best way to consumer can be reached the products.
In conclusion, albeit the qualification is basic criterion of products, however, the products can be enlarge obviously depend on advertising plan.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | gulbakhyt_90 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | trucn | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Aydin03 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Aydin03 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 89
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 89
- 4 fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have leads on to the idea that thay are also responsible for briging the children up. 67
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give r 61
- universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'lucrative money'.
Suggestion: lucrative money
... even private store and briskly receive a lucrative money. Because of these reasons, the daily us...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... internet, radios and papers. Formerly, a best qualified commodities are just spe...
^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'product'?
Suggestion: product
...comes to restrict. Nowadays if a normal products have a right adversiting plan it will b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12547528517 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88540800894 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.010269826 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237131651254 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702264324672 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859202286138 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128036979752 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865866343371 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.