Today’s children are living under more pressure from the society than children in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Write at least 350 words.
A different generation will be most affected by the change of the tides at each phase of our society. The generation in concern at the moment, according to certain arguments, is our youth, notably how much pressure is put on them. Though it must be mentioned that there are still some caveats to be addressed, which this article will discuss in depth, this consensus has been accepted by the mass, of which I am a part.
It should not be difficult to come up with an argument to support the statement, yet prejudice would be exercised if the hardships of past generations were not mentioned as well. Recognizing one's own advantage as a member of the youth, one should be able to realize that their forefathers had it far worse in terms of physical aspects such as money, food, clothing, and so on. All of them were far less plentiful previously than they are now, and they occupied much of the older generation's concern. Similarly, their stress level would surely be high in comparison to the "easier life" that today's youth have, which is true, but only on the surface level.
Dive further into human psychology, and it's evident why people came up with the idea in the first place: higher expectations. Because of the misconception that more resources equate to a better life, then better performance, a large portion of young people are at a disadvantage. First, the pipeline from enhanced quality of life to increased ability is not a pipeline at all; supporters of this theory leave out the bits and pieces that are societal change occurring concurrently, creating an ever-changing environment where challenges other than tangible ones take place. In actuality, the "bar" for academic accomplishment for all kids is being raised at a rate quicker than what the current generation, and most likely preceding ones as well, is accustomed to. Since teens are more likely to be diagnosed with stress, depression, anxiety, and similar conditions, which add to the burdens they already bear, mental health should be discussed as well. Naturally, the conclusion that the strain placed on children now is greater than it was in the past is supported by the convergence of all of these elements.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the difficulties that previous generations of children experienced, the demand on today's youngsters is undoubtedly felt far more strongly. Therefore, it is everyone's obligation to aid them in any capacity they can to alleviate some of this burden.
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society 84
- The best curriculum is not one that is based on a static body of knowledge but one which teaches students to cope with change 89
- Write an essay of about 350 words on the following topic Many cities around the world are considering turning streets into car free zones which helps curb pollution and make people healthier However some people believe that cities will suffer once this be 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this 84
- The best curriculum is not one that is based on a static body of knowledge but one which teaches students to cope with change 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 601, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...son to the 'easier life' that todays youth have, which is true, but only on ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03631961259 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97072229911 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598062953995 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3655044187 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14015345604 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461108568124 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304893115298 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838692942085 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365826571016 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 601, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...son to the 'easier life' that todays youth have, which is true, but only on ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03631961259 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97072229911 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598062953995 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3655044187 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14015345604 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461108568124 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304893115298 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838692942085 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365826571016 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.