In today's competitive world, families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say that the children in these families benefit from additional incomes, others feel that they lack support because of their parents’ absence. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion?
In the modern world, it has become a social norm that both parents have their own jobs, earning additional income to support the family. While some claim that working couples cannot provide their offsprings with sufficient care, I believe children benefit greatly when parents are employed.
On the one hand, the absence of parental attention is synonymous with more household risks towards their offsprings. Instinctively, children, especially those in primitive years, are of insatiable curiosity to explore the outside world. Thus, it is essential that they be under adults’ supervision to prevent further incidents from happening. Otherwise, a normal house can pose numerous threats, even mortal ones, to children. This is strikingly exemplified in endless papers about infants falling off from high-rise buildings due to parental neglect.
At the same time, occupied parents can ensure both their offsprings’ physical and mental well-being. Regarding the former, children's upbringing is significantly facilitated with parental extra earnings. As today's expenditure witnesses a consistent rise, money is a major factor determining living standards. In other words, children will have access to high-quality education and medical service only if a sustainable source of income is guaranteed. Another value is that children with working parents can develop a self-study habit. With less parental guidance, they are forced to learn mostly everything by themselves, from doing household chores to managing assignments. This type of studying proves highly effective in refining creativity and self-discipline, which are both necessary to advance in life.
In short, whilst many people argue that occupied parents have a downstream effect on the offsprings’ development; I approve of the opposite view, suggesting that children reap several benefits in terms of physical and mental growth from extra family income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-13 | Little_key | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Little_key | 84 | view |
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this set a bad example for young people To what extent do you agree or disagree to this 89
- For many people the reason they work hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In today s competitive world families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say that the children in these families benefit from additional incomes others feel that they lack support because of their parents absence Discuss both 89
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as to, in short, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79577464789 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95610282969 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683098591549 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7143982176 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.733333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323675973776 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915902739907 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525577659572 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185462663529 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656136044866 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.