In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
In the world where scientific and technological advances dominate, people working in the field of arts such as musicians, painters and writers still gain a great deal of attention. This is because arts can teach us certain things about life that we cannot learn from science and technology.
Firstly, arts give us the opportunity to see things from a different perspective. In the world of science and technology, we see things as the way they are; yet, in the world of arts, we are allowed to use our imagination and creativity to see things in the way we want. In a researcher’s eyes, for example, a cat is just an animal with soft fur and four legs; however, a cat, to a writer, could be a friend, a hero or a traditional symbol of a culture. This way of seeing things helps us to gain deeper insights into the world we live in and teaches us to think from different perspectives when encountering problems.
Another point about the benefits of arts is that while scientific and technological developments bring benefits to our physical lives, arts instill religious and spiritual values into each individual, which helps us to become a more well-rounded person. For instance, whenever I felt down and depressed, I often listen to the song called You raise me up which always gives me the feeling that I can do anything that I have a passion for as long as I put my heart into it. I think we hardly ever have this feeling when we carry out a scientific research or a technological project.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that in the world of arts we can learn various things that are absent from the world of science and technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | Anoopben | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Mario Nese | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | TOANTRAN | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | huynhhongtram | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | lamnhathuy | 89 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 61
- The leaders of organisations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be leaders. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Topic: Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 61
- Topic: Some people believe that smoking should be banned due to its effects, others argue that smoking has too many benefits to be banned. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66891891892 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87294087343 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.14020343 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.2 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340253160492 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133989555359 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953605928626 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230284373895 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121951017824 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.3001002004 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.