Today TV channels provide man s sport show more than women s sport show Why Should TV channel give equal time for women s sport and men s sport

Today, sports media have been dominated by sportsmen, leaving sportswomen with very little attention. This essay will outline some reasons and I believe that equal coverage for both sexes is necessary.
The man reason leading to this prejusdice is because of an undeniable fact that sports performed by men are, in many cases, more engaging and fun to watch, spectators will frequently exprience through a roller coaser while enjoying these matches. This is because men are innately stronger, more competitive and more aggressive, which makes their shows seemingly more sensational and dramatic. Therefore, people generally prefer watching men doing sports to women, and the television industry can generate more profits from matches and contests played by men.
However, actions must be taken as soon as possible to bridge the gap about this difference. Although women teams have earned a series of highest awards from the international competitions they involve in, there is little public endorsement towards their achievements and effort during years of working recklessly. TV channels play a crucial role in spreading these images across the country and arising people’s awareness about the sacrifice of women in sports tournaments, so they can earn much more motivation and love from human beings. Moreover, more showing time may attract additional investments from sponsors, which in turn may positively affect wage rates of sportswomen. Additionally, achievements of female sports figures shown on TV can encourage those with potential to embark on their sporting career.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that despite having a higher view rating in the exposure of men’s sport on TV, TV channels should increase the number of women’s sports shows because it can inspire those who wish to pursue sport-related careers and improve the lives of female sportswomen.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...though women teams have earned a series of highest awards from the international competiti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntial to embark on their sporting career In conclusion I reaffirm that despite ha...
^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: TV
...rating in the exposure of mens sport on TV TV channels should increase the number of ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34602076125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68626237652 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653979238754 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 289.0 20.2975951904 1424% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1545.0 106.682146367 1448% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 289.0 20.7667163134 1392% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 78.0 7.06120827912 1105% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398873423577 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.398873423577 0.084324248473 473% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233723379948 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831732772112 0.056905535591 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 148.3 13.0946893788 1133% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -230.32 50.2224549098 -459% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 117.2 11.3001002004 1037% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.23 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.11 8.58950901804 269% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 117.6 10.1190380762 1162% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 118.0 10.7795591182 1095% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.