Today, TV channels provide man’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows, why? Should TV channel give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
These days, it is true that sport shows played by men are dominating all TV channels, compares to sport programmes played by women due to the fact that most people have more interest in men’s sporting events and that is the main reason for this. Personally, I believe that women’s sports should be paid to attention.
The major reason is that sport games participated by men athletes often appear violent and aggresive moments or sensational conflicts between another teams, which give viewers sense of attraction than women’s sport games. Therefore, a huge of people spend their time and money to watch live matches, which lead to big broadcasters are able to earn a large profit by selling ticket. Not to mention that sportsmen events contribute to promote commercial sport fields and bond the relationship between another countries. Let’s take SEA games 30 as a typical example, the match actually attracted a thoundsands people, advertising contracts as well as investors such as rewards from Vietlott.
However, a coin always has two sides, imagine if the trend of in favor of sportmen continue to growing, resulting from gender inequality in society. In other word, women might be looked down than men. Sport programmes have been held to strengthen and maintain our health or serve as an entertainmental purposes, so sport games played by women should be given a equal opportunity.
In conclusion, the majority of audience watching men’s sport channles is the obvious explantion why TV producers provide more men’s shows, and I am suppose that women’s sports should be invested equally as men’s sport.
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 61
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 61
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t games played by women should be given a equal opportunity. In conclusion, th...
^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...cers provide more men’s shows, and I am suppose that women’s sports should be invested ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
... that women’s sports should be invested equally as men’s sport.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21673003802 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75623702104 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6175717099 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.2 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483624905537 0.244688304435 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17462911305 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147629199316 0.0667982634062 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312369172139 0.151304729494 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124473012487 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t games played by women should be given a equal opportunity. In conclusion, th...
^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...cers provide more men’s shows, and I am suppose that women’s sports should be invested ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
... that women’s sports should be invested equally as men’s sport.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21673003802 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75623702104 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6175717099 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.2 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483624905537 0.244688304435 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17462911305 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147629199316 0.0667982634062 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312369172139 0.151304729494 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124473012487 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.