Today we live in a world with advanced science and technology, but people still greatly value artists such as writers, painters and musicians. What can art tell us that advanced science and technology cannot?
In a contemporary world we can see a great jump in developing science and technology. Smartphones, domestic appliances and other gadgets flooded our everyday life, mainly with a purpose to make our daily routine more effortless, secondly the phenomenon of advanced technology brings to us a huge variety of entertainments. But this wouldn’t work without people who make an entertaining content, such as writers, painters and musicians.
I tend to think, that the field of art was providing a prominent impact to people through all the history of our civilization. Moreover, to glance on history, the art is obviously the first phenomenon to exist, starting with the rock paintings as an example. Society, by itself, created art as a way to express fillings and experience. Theatre, actually, was one of the first shelters of art, besides the entertaining aim, it also held a great mission to teach an audience of that time. By the way of comedy and satire plays, the weak sites of human personality were brightly shown to people.
Of course, there are some opportunities that works of art are capable to give us, but advanced technologies cannot. One clear example is a book. To read a book equally means to make a reader’s imagination work. This work improves several necessary skills, like phrase building, paraphrasing, also expanding vocabulary etc. However, it would be fair to say, that reading nowadays is rather easier due to developing in technology field. Anyone can read anything, just from his own house on his\her e-book. But nevertheless, somebody had to write this certain book. Musician had to write a melody, poet had to write a poem, singer had to sing a song. All these parts together or separate give us foods for brain end emotional relief as well.
To conclude, at the present day, the progress trends towards. Advanced technologies are on the step of constant evolution, AI (artificial intelligence) is existing now. It is evolving its skills, perhaps, every second, now in the year 2023 it is able to create even works of art such as songs and paintings. But is there any ‘soul’ in these works? Is there a sense of humor or a great disappointment of the author? Is there any teaching purpose, or these are simply made to relax an audience, to force us to think less? I suppose that, despite an enormous profit of the scientific technologies, they are not able to substitute for human beings’ mind and fillings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-19 | Valentinka | 92 | view |
- Today we live in a world with advanced science and technology but people still greatly value artists such as writers painters and musicians What can art tell us that advanced science and technology cannot 92
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children 84
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch as writers, painters and musicians. I tend to think, that the field of art w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sonality were brightly shown to people. Of course, there are some opportunities ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'But'.
Suggestion: But
...t from his own house on his\her e-book. But nevertheless, somebody had to write this certain boo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 740, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for brain end emotional relief as well. To conclude, at the present day, the pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, i suppose, of course, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95145631068 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91110802109 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604368932039 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3060935984 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95833333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219734797875 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489465844404 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623933789892 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124089281511 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063661322415 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.