The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The top priority of businesses is making money, and they do not need to have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The apex purpose of businesses is making wealth and enrich people’s life. Henceforth, there is a debatable statement that they have rights to neglect social obligations. My opinion is that this notion is wrong in this day and age, as there are many collective duties that they must enroll in.

I accept that the primacy of any companies is making profits to survive in this competitive world. They have to have a virtuous financial background to run their costs, as well as invest in new technologies and innovations to acquire advantages over their opponents. Enterprises, therefore, set goals to maximize their productivity and, however, pollute the environment by discharging untreated directly to the air, earth, and water. Some make up for it, but others ignore because of their thought that protecting their surroundings is not their duty. That critical thinking should be discarded, as lasting profits must be accompanied by clean environment.

Besides environmental obligations, businesses ought to possess other fundamental duties. Firstly, they must ensure their employees’ living conditions by regularly raising their wages or constructing accommodations. By doing so, not only do they indicate responsibility to the public, but they also have a chance to boost their productivity as well. Next, they should sponsor and participate in humanitarian activities to share their sympathy with the disabled and those who are in difficult circumstance. Regularly paying taxes to the authorities is another rule they must follow.

In conclusion, although making profits in businesses is a must, I believe the opinion of disregarding their communal liabilities must be removed.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-21 HaleyLin2000 78 view
2024-02-21 HaleyLin2000 56 view
2023-11-22 buahkiwienak 61 view
2023-11-22 buahkiwienak 61 view
2023-11-12 uyenmia 84 view
Essays by user fanncia99 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tages over their opponents. Enterprises, therefore, set goals to maximize their p...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5444015444 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16516138568 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3876317482 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.571428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170637293123 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613770746459 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658722998654 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104706721686 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047416872002 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.