Topic: In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations.
In recent years, it has been reported that people in developed countries have a higher average life expectancy than in the past. This trend can be the original reasons for many negative consequences in our society and I believe that the government should provide several policies to mitigate the potential problems.
There are various issues attracting social concerns due to the increase in life expectancy. One of the drawbacks is that the government will have more heavy burdens on the national budget. In other words, the growth in the number of elderly people is causing the amount of money needed for the pension to rise, while the government will receive less money in taxes from the workforce. Another negative impact is that younger people will have to bear more pressure to support their parents and grandparents. For instance, many Vietnamese young adults are facing a wide range of financial problems because their salary is used for their elderly relatives’ taking care services expenses.
In my view, the government should enforce many policies to solve the problems related to a longer lifetime. Firstly, an effective solution would be done is to increase the retirement age from 60 to 70. By doing that, the government can reduce burdens on the amount of pension for the elders. A second measure is that more of the national budget should be allocated to older people’s basic needs. For example, the Japanese national budget includes categories for accommodation, health care services and transportation to support the older people, which can help younger people to have more time for their work.
In conclusion. In many nations having a high standard of living, the increase in life expectancy has had many effects on our community, which can be tackled by the government’s actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Ali Elameen | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | wIsaac | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Phạm Việt Khoa | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18305084746 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81161051561 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549152542373 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9321861114 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.615384615 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17955170175 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581722994326 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028195417486 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111250202078 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327052883318 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.