Topic: Fewer and fewer spend time on walking.
What is the reason? How we can encourage people to walk?
It is true that walking daily habits is one of the good habits. Fewer and fewer people spend time on walking. Unluckily, it has negative effects on our society. This essay will analyse the main reason and recommend some practical methods to tackle this issue.
One of the main culprits is that people have a various transportation choices. For example, today we have a lots of cars, motorbikes, buses…… but in the past we do not. Therefore, most of the people think that walking is a long distance and they refuse to walk by driving motorbikes or cars. Also, with the development in the method of transport lead to cut less and less space for pedestrian. Another contributing factor is that work pressure may prohibit people from walking. Because of the difficulty in their life, almost people try to make more money to enhance their life and they forget to care about their health. Consequently, fewer and fewer people spend time on walking.
However, there are a number of practical ways that we can implement to handle this problem. I think this most obvious is that government should discourage motorbikes and cars through giving more taxes on the selling price of those cars and motorbikes. Thanks to this, space for pedestrian will be restored again. Another approach is that governmental institutions need to raise people’s awareness on their health. For instance, some walking competition or walking festival can be held for encouraging people’s walking habit. As a result, they realize the value of their health to work better.
In conclusion, it can be said that walking daily habits is a global issues these days. However. If the solutions mentioned above are implement seriously, this problems will improved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-22 | tienhuy1234 | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-22 | tienhuy1234 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...practical methods to tackle this issue. One of the main culprits is that people ...
^^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...ion choices. For example, today we have a lots of cars, motorbikes, buses…… but in the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'issue'?
Suggestion: issue
...d that walking daily habits is a global issues these days. However. If the solutions m...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...y habits is a global issues these days. However. If the solutions mentioned above are i...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...entioned above are implement seriously, this problems will improved.
^^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'improve'
Suggestion: improve
...implement seriously, this problems will improved.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0487804878 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69723322614 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574912891986 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.360213907 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.2631578947 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1052631579 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324015954103 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973069157394 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13075398092 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188824224486 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682581424714 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.