Topic: Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recent years, the issue of whether society's focus and inputs in the wildlife preservation is over or not become a contentious issue. Despite the argument of some people that the resources for wild animals are too much that deprive others areas development such as technological and medical related advances, however, it is my belief that it is worthwhile to protect the species in the world. Tow principal reasons for this are as follows.
For a start, nature environment's balance and conservation is firmly connected with human. The ecosystem need various kinds of animals to maintain it. For example, some plant need birds and animals to spread the seed to attain the biodiversity and some species can be the predators of evil animals. If people do not take the initiative to enforce the preservation of animals, the ecosystem will be undermined and the final victims are human. Without a proper nature environment, our crops will be decimated by the harmful insects, and the next generation can no longer live in a diverse world. only when the ecosystem is balanced, human's safety and life can be pledged. Therefore, it will never be too much to give attention in the preservation of the wildlife.
Moreover, human should take the responsibility to provide a safety home for animals as they have been disturbing by human beings for a long period. For instance, birds routes is narrower due to the construction of skyscrapers. Owing to the development of human society, we have occupied the original home of the animals and have destroyed their habitats. As we are the one who are responsible for their threats, we should put as much as we can to compensate them.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my view that it is reasonable for human to preserve the wild. Not only do they facilitate the ecosystem balance, but it is also our responsibility to protect them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-29 | soji_kab@hotmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-27 | Veejar89 | 77 | view |
| 2020-04-20 | mohd shaiq | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | happyhappy | 82 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 54 | view |
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measure do you think might be effective? 89
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities study. Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 78
- Some people say that humanitarian subjects such as philosophy, history and literature that people study in universities have no value for their future career. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant 56
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
... can no longer live in a diverse world. only when the ecosystem is balanced, humans ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso our responsibility to protect them.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95283018868 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88234952222 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531446540881 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3489917165 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155285916823 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499326960842 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584960508073 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982087770946 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559291166145 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.