Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement?
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:
"Times New Roman","serif"">The use of technology is increasing rapidly in the
modern world. Growing technological influence can even be seen in the
classroom. Despite this, it is disagreed that technology will completely
replace the classroom teacher in the foreseeable future. Analyzing the
inability of a technology-driven teacher to both cater for students learning
needs and instill motivation will show this.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:
"Times New Roman","serif"">Firstly, a teacher powered by artificial
intelligence would have difficulty interpreting the educational needs of a
classroom of students. For example, Honda Asimov, one of the world’s most
advanced robots, has trouble distinguishing simple human emotions. If today’s
most advanced artificial intelligence cannot categorize these basic physical
cues, it is difficult to believe that a robot could be capable of altering
study plans and teaching styles in a dynamic classroom setting. Thus, this
makes it clear that a technology-driven teacher is not going to be operational
anytime in the near future.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:
"Times New Roman","serif"">Secondly, a robotic teacher would not be able to
establish the emotional connection needed to motivate students. The American
scientific theory of education plays a good example here. This widely supported
theory argues that young learners are most motivated when they share an
emotional relationship with their instructor. As most would agree expecting
children to form emotional ties to machinery is unrealistic, the argument that
technology will replace the teacher in the classroom can be debunked.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:
"Times New Roman","serif"">In summary, a robotic teacher would lack the
classroom dynamism and emotional intelligence needed to be an effective
instructor. Thus, it is clear why having a class run entirely by a machine is an
idea that will not be realized anytime soon. It is predicted that computer
technology will not replace traditional human teachers in the foreseeable
future.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | hakinguyen | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Hira Shaheen | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Hira Shaheen | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | alifdores | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | 0102mickey | 61 | view |
- many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit those places. 67
- Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? 56
- Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? 61
- some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 56
- Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , "
...ont-family: "Times New Roman","serif"'>The use of technology...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , "
...ont-family: "Times New Roman","serif"'>Firstly, a teacher po...
^^^^^^
Line 23, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , "
...ont-family: "Times New Roman","serif"'>Secondly, a robotic t...
^^^^^^
Line 32, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , "
...ont-family: "Times New Roman","serif"'>In summary, a robotic...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2310.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 7.62376237624 5.12529762239 149% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.79710012335 2.80592935109 314% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547854785479 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 143.95167013 49.4020404114 291% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 192.5 106.682146367 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 32.0 4.38176352705 730% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170880857344 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102621387038 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106330161748 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663825630667 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840814397855 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.1 13.0946893788 207% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 3.8 50.2224549098 8% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 27.21 12.4159519038 219% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.