The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies?
Family traditions are the established habits to do something with family. However, modern life-style and opportunities are disrupting those traditions, especially food related ones, because of variety of services society provides.
First of all, current capitalistic society offers a wide range of food choises. For instance, variety of food outlets that people use to eat out. As a result, significant amount of people become fussy eaters that can not meet satisfy their needs during family feasts.
Furthermore, the development of fast food industry is one of the main contributing factors. Most of the society have hectic work schedule that leaves people with little or no time for other daily needs. Consequently, to preserve time people resort to prepared meals, instead of ordinary food. Take for example residents of megapolises, where traffic conjunctions and high competition among workers attributes to insufficiency of time. Moreover, different skills like culinary suffer from such schedule and result in willingness to eat outside of home.
Apart from that, tendency of keeping traditions generally decreases, despite of hectic work schedule or variety of food in this case. The attitude towards traditions is governed by developing facilities and unnediness of traditions. A good example would be set of different traditions that had functions in the past, but are not vital in modern world, like eating together with whole family. An expected outcome is decrease in the quantity of traditions that are past on to younger generations.
As a whole, modern lifestyle affects the appreciation of family values and the way younger generations perceive them. Hence, people become more self reserved and feeble the bond with not only their relatives, but also with the rest of the world, which might result in losing opportunities and individualistic society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-25 | spumoni | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | mary.ssherr | 89 | view |
| 2018-08-09 | mary.ssherr | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007. 56
- The development of technology has caused environmental problems So some people think people should choose a simpler way of life while others think we should use technology to solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV 76
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information on the percentage of Canadians gave money to charitable organisations by age range for the years 2000 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main f 100
- Many people are optimistic of the 21st century and see it as an opportunity to make positive changes to the world To what extent do you share their optimism What changes would you like to see in the new century 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ce, variety of food outlets that people use to eat out. As a result, significant am...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, apart from, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51211072664 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92437701723 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626297577855 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.385680159 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132977654782 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429592868363 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384623927983 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749951059936 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328877074511 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.