Universities should allocate the same amount of money to their sport activities as they allocate to their libraries. Do you agree or disagree
It is often seen that universities provide best education to their students. They also focused on physical health by offering them various sports facilities. Some people argue that sports are equally important and must have same allocation of funds as libraries. However, others state that main aptitude of education institution is to provide lofty education and must invest handsome amount for the betterment of libraries. I agree to some extent that role of library is far more important than sports activities.
It is very important to have good physical education for students. It will not only improve their health but also helped them in developing skills such as team work, handling pressure under tensed situations etc. Therefore, it is required by the universities to spend on this constituent. Furthermore, nowadays there is too much study pressure on students. In order to relax and reenergize such activities should be provides on regular intervals.
Library is an essential part of every educational institution. Large numbers of students rely on libraries to complete their assignments, research works and final projects. It shows that existence of library is incomplete without having library in it. Thus, huge amount should be invested on libraries to improve its books catalogue. Latest books, journals and other reference materials should be incorporated in libraries to facilitate its users.
To sum up, I would like to say that spending time in libraries is more worthful and has lofty values than playing. Universities must upgrade their libraries accordance with technological advancement without considering cost, so that numerous benefits could be taken out
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today 61
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attraction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 36, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'provide the best'.
Suggestion: provide the best
It is often seen that universities provide best education to their students. They also ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 335, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Latest'.
Suggestion: The Latest
...braries to improve its books catalogue. Latest books, journals and other reference mat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48659003831 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91782514159 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624521072797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9951553182 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2352941176 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3529411765 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265130458703 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717737124776 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430179377321 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139266445232 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497989180652 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.