University should accept male and female students equally in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People are of the opinion that tertiary institution should accept equal numbers of boys and girls student in all course. I strongly agree with this statement because admitting same proportion will help both sex for future occupational vacancy as well as avoid discrimination.
To begin with, one of the main reasons why equal numbers of male and female students should be accepted in all subject is to prepare them for future vacant opportunities that might arise in that line of career. In other words, both sex should be trained to be academically ready to fill in any vacant position pertaining to that course. It is unhealthy to allow a particular sex dominate a subject as both gender ought to be eligible to face any future challenges. For example, a recent survey by The New York Time showed that in 2000, when university Ohio accepted same number of genders students to study engineering, the outcomes indicated that they were both capable to outshine each other on the job. Hence that occupation never experienced shortage of manpower.
In addition, limiting the number of a particular sex in a subject will be considered as obvious discrimination. This is to say, preference should not be given to a certain gender with regards to a specific subject because both male and female students clearly have the capacity to do excellently well in every subject. A clear instance was seen in Chicago in 2010, as Maria college continuously gave more female students admission to study nursing at the expense of their male counterpart. This resulted to a law suit against the college for discrimination. It is therefore evident that university should accept equal ratio of both genders in all course to avoid been charged for discrimination.
In conclusion, it is argued that same number of boys and girls should be accepted in all subjects. It is my believe that equal number will make both sex ready for future career opportunities and protect the university from been accused of discrimination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Moaz | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...oth sex for future occupational vacancy as well as avoid discrimination. To begin with,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y The New York Time showed that in 2000, when university Ohio accepted same numbe...
^^
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...able to outshine each other on the job. Hence that occupation never experienced short...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 414, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...a college continuously gave more female students admission to study nursing at the expen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... expense of their male counterpart. This resulted to a law suit against the colle...
^^
Line 6, column 512, Rule ID: LAWSUIT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lawsuit'?
Suggestion: lawsuit
...r male counterpart. This resulted to a law suit against the college for discrimination....
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 109, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...d be accepted in all subjects. It is my believe that equal number will make both sex re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03903903904 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91056529032 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507507507508 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4077759631 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243807581997 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860727174316 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738483446943 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155899161717 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545405858269 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.