University students often focus on one subject. However, some people think that universities should encourage to learn a range of other subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
When it comes to the education, there has been a debate. Higher academic institutes are frequently focused on one subject; albeit, University ought to stimulate toddlers towards learn a wide range of topics according to few individuals. I assent to this statement up to certain level. Apt justifications and logical exemplifications are discussed further.
Elucidating the reasons of opting other subject the first and foremost one is that easy accessibility for students to find their fascinating subjects. As, various students may not good in a particular subjects. So, by choosing diversified subjects, curiosity can be increased among the toddlers as well as work efficiency can be rised. In add to this, students can escalate their hidden talent by getting their own subject. This is to say that some learners have better skill and ample knowledge about a particular subject which might help to gain a job. For instance, basic mechanical and physics are mostly chosen by students according to survey.
Furthermore, remote adaptability to gain communication skills and improve their thinking ability. In order to explain, if universities provide better subjects which are related to business and human resources instead of providing one subject. As a reason, student might learn practical skills and better understanding with the help of those subjects.this will have positive impact on their forthcoming job.
On the other hand, I also believe that University must focus on one subject. The obvious cause is that sophomore can constantly focus on one stream. To explain, some higher academic institutes are giving a choice to student about choosing one topic because they can improve their creativity in one subject with good grade in exam. Moreover, particular University's identity can be maintained. As, they want to increase their name and fame. To illustrate, Dhirubhai Ambani institute is one of the best University for IT according to survey.
To recapitulate, it can be eventually commented that students should have freedom to opt manifold subjects; howbeit, toddlers can concentrate on one topic which might less burden for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-20 | Gautam Kothiya | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | Gautam Kothiya | 78 | view |
- . Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Somepeoplesaythatcountriesandindividualsshouldprotecttheseanimals fromdyingout,whileotherssayweshouldconcentratemoreonproblemsofhumanbeings.Discussbothviewsandgive youropinion. 84
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Somepeoplesaythatcountriesandindividualsshouldprotecttheseanimals fromdyingout,whileotherssayweshouldconcentratemoreonproblemsofhumanbeings.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion. 89
- Line graph 73
- Bar graph 73
- University students often focus on one subject. However, some people think that universities should encourage to learn a range of other subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... learn a wide range of topics according to few individuals. I assent to this state...
^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nts to find their fascinating subjects. As, various students may not good in a par...
^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ractical skills and better understanding with the help of those subjects.this wil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98520064694 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568452380952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.534369019 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259491873348 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773992203942 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661141680516 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144485748088 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433904559591 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.