The use of corporal punishment (physically hitting students) in schools is in decline, yet it should be used to improve behaviour.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Essay topics:

The use of corporal punishment (physically hitting students) in schools is in decline, yet it should be used to improve behaviour.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There are different types of punishment for students due to mistakes that they make, in which one of them is using tools to hit students. Although this way of punishing had been reduced in popularity recently, some people think that it should be used to deter them. Personally, I do not support the usage of such tools to beat students.

On the one hand, beating pupils in schools is a way to prevent the repetition of their bad behaviors. Firstly, most students are frightened by the hurting feeling of being beaten by rods, having the tendency to avoid misbehaving. Secondly, the beating by rods would leave behind an obsession in students that is helpful in preventing future repeating their mistakes. this was one of the only ways to punish students in countries such as Viet Nam before the modern age, due to its simplicity.

On the other hand, misuse of hitting students would leave behind serious mental injuries for them. To start with, students who suffered too much from this way of punishment would then have bad feelings about their teachers, which could be hating or fearing feelings or even depression. As a result, the learning process would be affected negatively, such as slowed knowledge acquiring or losing interest in studying. therefore, corporal punishment is now forbidden in most countries, except in some developing countries like some countries in Africa.

In conclusion, for the simplicity of corporal punishment, it was widely used in the past and had been a part of the culture of some countries. however, due to its detrimental effects, most countries prohibited this type of punishment, therefore being less popular than it used to.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-20 hungdung2507 61 view
2019-12-20 hungdung2507 11 view
Essays by user hungdung2507 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...enting future repeating their mistakes. this was one of the only ways to punish stud...
^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: ONE_OF_THE_ONLY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one of the few'?
Suggestion: one of the few
...ture repeating their mistakes. this was one of the only ways to punish students in countries su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...lings about their teachers, which could be hating or fearing feelings or even depression....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 418, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...quiring or losing interest in studying. therefore, corporal punishment is now forbidden i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... part of the culture of some countries. however, due to its detrimental effects, most c...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to start with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06137184116 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73035906308 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584837545126 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0270682948 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.846153846 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22634333035 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764342552949 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455699711741 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140462571495 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412149566537 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.