The use of corporal punishment physically hitting students in schools is in decline yet it should be used to improve behaviour To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

The usage of advance punishments in primary educational institutions is seeing a drop in number, but it must be implemented to enhance students conduct. In my opinion, I mostly disagree to continue using such activities on students. I support my statement by providing some ideas and related examples.

To begin with, punishing a student is, by no means a solution to correct the mindset of a pupil. Instead, teachers can talk to them in a calm and understanding manner, so they can distinguish between, what is right and what is wrong. If a student does any mistake, for instance, copies and gets caught in an exam, rather than going physical on the kid, we can explain and convince, how copying is actually a bad way to pass an exam and make him understand to write the exam fairly like the other students.

Secondly, physical action on students can affect their mental condition, which may lead to serious depression problems. For example, in my schooling, a friend of mine was always given punishment by the lecturer, whenever he commits a mistake. Gradually, he started feeling low on himself and lately, he went into a state of depression. To add on, he was sent to rehabilitation center and was given counselling for a couple of weeks. After couple of weeks, he was able to comeback to normal life.

To conclude, punishing a student inorder to improve their conduct is not an optimum solution. Instead, there are many other methods by which, pupils behaviour can be set in a right path.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understand writing'.
Suggestion: understand writing
... a bad way to pass an exam and make him understand to write the exam fairly like the other students...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: TO_COMEBACK[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to come back'?
Suggestion: to come back
...eks. After couple of weeks, he was able to comeback to normal life. To conclude, punishi...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82558139535 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82047262021 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647286821705 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7142810441 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7692307692 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152245686987 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512303517207 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391168836231 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936372790779 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417135595027 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.