Nowadays usage of mobile phones in many places become impolite as smoking. Some people believe in cell phone prohibition like smoking. I'm totally agree with cell phone ban in designated places and in following essay will state my opinion based on facts and examples.
Therefore, cell phones keep us in touch with our love ones, friends and families, its impact to social behaviour is enormous. People are more than ever using their cell phones as a way how to socialise with others. Mobile phone users spend most of their time on communication platforms such as WhatsApp or Skype instead of personal contact with other human beings. This habit cause social anxiety, which have been proven by mane researches and likely leads to sociopathy and aggressive behaviour. This is caused by lack of emotion showed while interacting with others. Despite mobile phone producers developing technologies to make their products more socialised. For example Apple currently developed MeEmoji, which might represent look of user and transfer face expressions into the recorded message.
Secondly, some people might argue that smoking is more harmful to our health than cell phones. Nevertheless, scientists proved global impact to all parts of human body, using mobile phones kills more people suddenly than cigarettes. Brilliant example is using of cell phones while driving car. One of three fatal car accidents in Europe happened due to cell phone use by drivers. Also, pedestrians are more likely hit by a car, light rail or train when all they attention is to the screen of the phone when crossing street.
To sum up, I'm strongly agree with applying rules of cell phone usage in public places, because many people do not think through its negative impact to our metal and body health.
- Some people believe that countries should invite foreign companies to open their brunches, offices and factories in order to develop their economies. others think countries should invest in their own companies instead. Discuss both views and give your own 61
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 67
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rel 61
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...in cell phone prohibition like smoking. Im totally agree with cell phone ban in de...
^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'causes'.
Suggestion: causes
...act with other human beings. This habit cause social anxiety, which have been proven ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...one when crossing street. To sum up, Im strongly agree with applying rules of c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13058419244 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46185816444 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632302405498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6923983028 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258013139899 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912061427572 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689467005435 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166970514626 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942174668788 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.