The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, with the development of technology, mobile phones are becoming more and more popular than ever. This technology brings to humanity both pros and cons, but some people only look at its disadvantages regardless of the benefits and believe that mobile phones should be banned in certain places like smoking. I personally disagree with this opinion.
First of all, the things that are banned tend to be the ones that can seriously affect one's health or the people around them, such as smoking, drugs or weapons. Mobile phones, otherwise, cause little negative effect on the users. In other words, if people know how to use phones properly, they can take all the advantage from this technology. In addition, the concern about problems that smartphones bring is insignificant and controllable. To be specific, the effects such as eye diseases or the addiction are rare and do not always happen. However, some people who read about those kinds of news on social media, by which they also use mobile phones, think that if mobile phones are not banned, people will fall into the same situation. With that being said, they are just scared of the risk and demise which are not likely to happen.
On the other hand, people these days cannot live without mobile phones. In other words, some people also live on this technology. Majority of the jobs, especially in the big city, involve mastered skill of using phones and computers. Therefore, banning mobile phones means depriving the jobs which people live on. This, thus, not only causes unemployment but also widespread poverty. Furthermore, people also have a demand on recreation, socialization and other daily affairs which need mobile phones. As a consequence, if people can’t use phones anymore, their life will be shuffled and fall into a deep crisis.
In conclusion, mobile phones should not be considered as a potential peril, but a device to help humans. As long as we know how to take advantage of this technology, what we receive are only benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-08 | zhao_kangg | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Bigk016 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | nphan | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | panekajizhongben | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...o be the ones that can seriously affect ones health or the people around them, such ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...hat can seriously affect ones health or the people around them, such as smoking, drugs or weapons. Mob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00892857143 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57093076917 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9521558385 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5789473684 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15789473684 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251664573137 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774083322707 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623461349637 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168223163422 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392697061439 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.