The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages

Essay topics:

The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages?

Social media is becoming the part of communication in todays life. Some beleive interacting with social media sites is replacing face-to-face communication. I beleive that, although there are some drawbacks interacting with this type of sites, it has positive sides due to its convinience and ergonomic design.

Having social media profile can supply user with convinient communicating time. The user can add contact details on its account and search for friends or collegues. For example, while friends located in the distant from each other, they can communicate with each other, using their account. Furthermore, this site have been ergonimically designed, which the user not only type messages, but also call his partner via his profile. Nevertheless, there is a bottom which the caller can just click and turn on the video. As a result while people communicate with each other they can share with emotions or become aweare of each others.

By contrast, communicating via social media sites can be limeted. It means, the user should have access to the internet with a good internet speed. Having poor internet might interrupt communication, stopping data transfer. Mopreover, partners both should be online for exchanging their pleasuries. When I had to communicate with my friend who was far from me, for instance, I had trouble with connecting them. In that time my friend was offline and my efforts was useless. On the other had, when we both were online we exchanged informations. So, communicating in virtual world can be useful while there is a distant between both sides.

To sum up, indeed, currently a great number of people use social media sites due to the exchanging information. Despite using these side require the internet connection, people can chat on these sites.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-22 minhlamnguyen1204 73 view
2021-09-03 linh thao 67 view
2020-12-23 nam.phanthanh97 56 view
2020-10-27 nhibinhbinh 90 view
2020-10-26 Tuan Harry 84 view
Essays by user Shakhzod Yodgorov :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21107266436 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83495973225 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584775086505 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1045459458 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.2631578947 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2105263158 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12249084199 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461229453511 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763766753712 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102532481896 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754748343562 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.