The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think it is advantages outweigh disadvantages?
Nowadays, people use app communication and replacing face-to-face interaction in this life. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of people use to social media too much. First,the birth of social networks for modern life are believed to keep in touch with people that they know among people in society regardless of their background. This social mediation support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall communicate with each other anywhere rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority when meeting face-to-face, which eventually promotes friendly society. Second, people use to social media would probably result in a greater international relationships, which benefits society in the long run. For example, large family gatherings many be impossible to organize and, without the existence of social media, a decline communication with relatives and close friends. Many people have hundred of followers on their Facebook page. In fact, it is acknowledgeable that community skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits one people use to social media too much. First, all people just taking with each other on social media would likely correspond with a real interactions. Don’t meet and talking outside, people could become over-reliant on the social media, meaning that, prone to social anxiety syndrome, there would be less input to develop other important areas such as the healthcare system and job opportunities. Second, community on social media would tempt many young people including those who are not real interactions inclined or show no interest talking and meeting everyone, thereby great burdens for society and their future or their opportunities in real life and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing balance between real interactions and using social media. It, instead, would be a more community viable option if the resources were focused on supporting keep in touch and working.
I was discussed both sides of the argument about disadvantages and advantages. In my perspective, this argument have disadvantages outweigh advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 74
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while other believe that children should be free to do what they want Discussed both views and give your opinion 78
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views a 73
- Only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent you do agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ople use to social media too much. First,the birth of social networks for modern lif...
^^^^
Line 2, column 844, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ves and close friends. Many people have hundred of followers on their Facebook page. In...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'interaction'?
Suggestion: interaction
...dia would likely correspond with a real interactions. Don’t meet and talking outside, people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, for example, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59116022099 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96316529833 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591160220994 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.5369072389 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342877963301 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109974987177 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844959452506 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193689892856 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705701243534 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.