Using facebook as a tool of online learning
The increase in availability of modern gadgets has led to radically different from any previous decade in the way students today study. There is no denying the fact that Internet plays an essential role in online studying, especially when there are many useful applications for social interacting purpose were invented and released in public. One of the most popular websites is Facebook, which is an American online social media and social networking service, and are used by over 2.4 billions users worldwide. To be considered as the most effective tool used in online learning, surprisingly that the feature is there are both pros and cons in using this social networking site.
It is believed that Facebook is instrumental in studying using Internet. Teachers can use it to create a strong sense of community among learners with flexible and comfortable schedule. Unlike other gadgets such as Zoom or Google Meet, teachers and students are not forced to online and join at the same time which is inconvenient. Once a person post something on their class’s page on Facebook, the others still can check it later in case they are not available at the time. Moreover, teachers can get students’ opinion whenever they want through the comments under the posts without being confused when many students speak out at the same time like other applications.
However, on the contrary to popular belief, Facebook may not be a reliable source of knowledge. As a cost-free websites is the reason why controlling such a huge amount of information on Facebook is apparently impossible. It’s obvious that everyone can post and share anything that they want and there is nobody makes sure and be responsible for whether the source users approach everyday is toxic information or not. unsurprisingly, since it is the company’s purpose to turn Facebook to be a community with full of absorbing things that bring joy to users. It leads to another disadvantageous matter is that students can easily get distraction from interesting entertainment posts while using Facebook as a tools for e-learning. That problem not only affects students’ result in studying, but also has poor impact on their health, especially for the eyes.
All thing considered, being a smart Facebook’s user on elearning requires students the ability to proactively perceive different sources of information and discipline for spending time online appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-06 | Nam Loc Trieu | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-05 | lethithuydi4b1 | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-04 | Thi Bình Phạm | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-03 | nguyenthiphuonganh4b1 | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-03 | Ngọc Ngân | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e for whether the source users approach everyday is toxic information or not. unsurprisi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unsurprisingly
...h everyday is toxic information or not. unsurprisingly, since it is the company’s purpose to t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a tool' or simply 'tools'?
Suggestion: a tool; tools
...rtainment posts while using Facebook as a tools for e-learning. That problem not only a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24871794872 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93351263572 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6676544414 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.9375 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227507612344 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082357911077 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067295569168 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141525077747 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442939829173 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.