We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer technology. It is used in business, crime detection and even to fly planes. What will it be used for in future? Is this dependence on technology a good thing or should we be suspicious of its benefits?
In the global era, most of the people are utilizing computer for various reasons, such as business, updating social media, education, research, navigating airplanes, as well as monitoring crime detection or cctv. One important aspect of this reality is most of the people tend to spent their time a bunch for utilizing computer than another activity. The issue is whether the dependent of people towards computer technology is more positive impacts for their self or exactly opposite? And what will it be used in the future. In my view, there are many positive impacts than its negative, and we could gain many benefits by using it in the future. I hold this views for some reasons which are set out below.
To begin with, I would like to argue that in the future computer technology should utilized for sustaining the environment in a country. Referring to research Centre for environmental studies the University of Melbourne stated that in the contemporary era many scholars have been expanding the function of computer for reducing the number of environmental damage and worse pollution, accelerating the production of green transportation, as well as boosting the quality of clean water.
On the other hand, the computer technology in the future also was alleged be able to render people are more healthier than previously as caused there are many computer applications that was made for calculating the number of heart rate, callories, as well as the problem of stunting in a society. some technological companies such as microsoft, samsung, as well as apple had launched notebook and smart watch that guided the consumer for doing healthy activity.
However, there are some people who believe that computer already contributed more negative impacts than their positivity. Unfortunately, there is little evidence to support this view.
Taking everything into consideration, I believe that in the future computer are more profitable for sustainabling environment and constructing people healthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Chawdaraj | 78 | view |
| 2015-04-28 | ms_mukti | 90 | view |
| 2014-08-03 | eddysuaib | 85 | view |
| 2014-06-13 | sasikalasakthivel | 60 | view |
- Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- post-school qualifications in Australia 1999 11
- Organized tours to remote areas and community are becoming more and more popular. Is this a positive or negative development for local people and the environment? 73
- Education for young people is important in many countries . However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...as alleged be able to render people are more healthier than previously as caused there are man...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...s the problem of stunting in a society. some technological companies such as microso...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, such as, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33018867925 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93433973318 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559748427673 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.4846261136 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.384615385 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246121439642 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930627734083 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707154858496 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11414934184 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776451325273 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.