Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that rich nations should allow more expatriates and afford them by essential support, like meals and shelter. This essay agrees with that statement because these men and women have lost everything, its a good step for affluent nations to show humanity is still alive in this era and rich nations can handle the cost for asylum seekers.
The first most prominent reason to acquire more refugees in developed nations is that humanity among nations is still alive now. That is to say that all individuals are equal and they should stand for each other. These people have destroyed everything in their nation and there is nothing left for them to survive. In some nation, innocent people are still running from war zones and do not want to face death and misery. For example, the United Kingdom had accepted more than three million refugees since the beginning of the Syrian crisis and the majority of them are women and children.
The second reason why refugees should allow them to enter rich countries is that can manage the cost for their living. That means, affluent nations can easily afford basic necessity for refugees and it will not cause any financial strain on the government's budget. Instead, the economy of the recipient countries will might benefit from the extra labor force that refugees provide. For instance, a study published by The Hindustan Times published that 0.7% of the UK national income was spent on Syrian refugees. The same study demonstrated that 70% of Syrian refugees are currently working in factories and manufacturing industries.
In conclusion, wealthy nations should not stop refugees to enter their territory for seeking basic assistance. The reason behind this, it is a humanitarian obligation and it will not affect the economy.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-18 | bluesky9667 | 73 | view |
2019-11-18 | bluesky9667 | 61 | view |
2019-10-29 | Helen Ng | 73 | view |
2019-10-23 | Dr. Blessy | 56 | view |
2019-10-23 | Dr. Blessy | 56 | view |
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Modern children are suffering from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for adults only. Obesity is a major disease prevalent among children. What are its causes and what solutions can be offered? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ese men and women have lost everything, its a good step for affluent nations to sho...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n handle the cost for asylum seekers. The first most prominent reason to acqui...
^^^^
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ajority of them are women and children. The second reason why refugees should al...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08108108108 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44802621705 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557432432432 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.247895809 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173974332382 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631407110543 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500798189108 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112619866782 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213529361473 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.