Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with
basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
It is argued that rich nations should accommodate more homeless people and equip them with shelters, food, water etc. This essay completely agrees with that statement because developed states have enough funds and facilities and this will create a positive development in the workforce of the host country.
Highly developed nations must give protection for the people who are affected by war or poverty because these nations have enough financial stability to provide the basic amenities. It is a humanitarian concern that the war affected citizens should not be left unattended but, they should be treated nicely with all facilities like, shelters, food, schools, colleges, hospitals etc. Most of them will be under mental tension and counseling, treatment etc. need to be made available and they should have homely feeling. For example, US is accommodating more and more Somalians and Africans nowadays because these countries are totally affected by fight and poverty.
Another reason why emigrants should be safeguarded is because the fact that the manpower of the domain will improve. The stateless people coming from different places and with different skills and qualification can contribute much for the host country. The companies can easily avail them with less compensation and also they will be ready to transfer their knowledge at the most for the country which rescued them in their helpless situation. Recent news stated that UK and US are benefited from refugees with their skill and knowledge because they open their door and accepting big number of people who are affected by economic and non economic disasters.
In conclusion, refugees must be protected by developed nations because economically developed nations can assist them with their basic needs and also it will generate a new highly developed manpower . Therefore, I believe that more high class states should come forward to accept homeless.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | Dr. Blessy | 56 | view |
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters? 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 84
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...generate a new highly developed manpower . Therefore, I believe that more high cla...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40264026403 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63933068826 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544554455446 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3822078109 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135754699992 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559703324029 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375619621298 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917026447306 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144874159762 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.