As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the question of whether businesses should sought to make a profit or focus on the social obligations has aroused people’s discussion. I completely agree with the idea that businesses should do more for society than simply make money.
Advocates of financial objects may argue that companies can only make a positive contribution to society if they are in good financial health. First, the higher the profits enterprises earned, the more taxes they pay to the government. In fact, authorities may have more revenue to spend in key fields such as education, healthcare…, which leads to an improvement in the quality of life of the whole community. Second, by earning huge profits, companies will have opportunity to grow their business. For example, firms use their capital to expand their production, which creates new job opportunities within the community.
However, I am in favor the idea that companies should not be run with the sole aim of maximising profit but have a wider role to play in society. First, since their acitivities have an effect on the environment, they must take some measures to make the situation better. Plenty of evidence suggests that production processes, without controls, may result in serious environmental degradation such as global warming stemming from factory emmissions or the irresponsible disposal of industrial waste, which can be improved, for example, by installing waste treatment systems in lieu of discharging chemical wastes into rives. Second, enterprises should help those who are less fortune since they have the money to do so. For example, big corporations such as Unilever and Vinamilk have enhanced their public image through philanthropic actions like supporting local charities and education initiatives.
In conclusion, although making money is the fundamental principle of business, all businesses should profoundly reflect upon their social responsibilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- The chart above gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 78
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1979 and 2009 84
- TV channels show more men s sport than women s sports Why is this the case Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Children s education is expensive In some countries the government pays some of or all of the costs Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Nowadays, the question of whether businesses should sought to make a prof...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51178451178 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05517662824 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639730639731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1529516934 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191583872687 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722918349308 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072135747363 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142507507496 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780732005607 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.