As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, many people hold the view that enterprises should have social obligations in parallel with the goal of making profit. In my point of view, I definitely agree with this idea that businesses should contribute more to society than simply make money.
On the one hand, it cannot deny that businesses have already contributed to society by focusing on making money. Firstly, by striving on profits, many companies has created thousands of job opportunities for worker both domestic and foreign. By doing that, the living condition of citizens has increased and easily approached modern technologies, thanks to the competitive environment between enterprises. For example, Apple, a well-known company in technology field especially cell phone, has brought revolutionary innovation in the use of mobile phones, thereby creating thousands of jobs for workers, reducing unemployment in some developing countries. In addition, governments also are received some benefits from enterprises and one of which is tax payments. From that, government have budget to focus on investing public infrastructures and national health for residents.
On the other hand, I believe that businesses should have responsible for social which can increase their reputation with communities. Firstly, since the rising number of factories these days has led to serious environmental damage, companies need to take immediate actions to help protect the natural environment. For example, they could try new technologies to recycle their wastes instead of disposing of them right away. Secondly, corporations should also consider helping those who are less fortunate such as homeless or disabled citizens. This will contribute to better society and help to enhance the image of the company or the brand.
In conclusion, building good reputation and creating profits are important for businesses, in order to achieve that, enterprises should have social responsibility and the goal of making money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Advertising Fast food Some people against and some are not Discuss both view 84
- The average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line services 2001 2010 67
- The graphs show the monthly prices of rice exports from ThaiLand and VietNam from 2012 to 2015 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a that businesses should contribute more to society than simply make money. On t...
^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is will contribute to better society and help to enhance the image of the company...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61666666667 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01361908675 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3123645386 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.357142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239622527956 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749960074009 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753804857269 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150704716778 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466383696274 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.