When children start school, teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than their parents. Do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, more and more people assume that teacher have an important role in children developing pathway, rather than their parents. Personally, although I strongly agree with this view but I do not believe that children who do not have a parents teaching could grow up totally.
In my opinion, when children start school, teachers have a huge impact on their intellectual and social development. That is pretty true, teachers is the main factor in teaching children about education and social behavior. According to the newest article, numerous parents pay attention to choose a good teacher for their children because they always believe that a good teacher would bring children good lessons. Children would be extended about types of knowledge such as science, math, foreign language by teachers. For instance, my sister is good at English because my parent let her learn second language when she was a child. She said that her teacher brought a big knowledge about foreign language that she has ever known before. Besides that, teachers train children in order to have a good social behavior. It can be seen from actual life, parents send them to nursery school since they were only 2 or 3 years old. This could help children independently and upgrade personal responsibility.
However, I also assume that children need to connect teaching between teachers and parent equally in order that they could be promoted totally. Parents have a big influence on children formative years. Children are taught to distinguish right and wrong or apologize when they do wrongly. According to statistics, Juvenile delinquency increase in 10% compared to the previous year. The main reason is lack of educating from parents. Thus, children always feel lonely and empty.
In conclusion, teachers have an important role to children development but I claim that parent teaching is crucial as well. Hence, teachers and parents need to combine simultaneously to have best outcome for children
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-02 | tien.xinh.ne | 67 | view |
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sport. Why is it? Is it a negative or positive development? 56
- Cycling is healthier and environmentally friendly form of transport. Nevertheless, cycling is getting less popular. What are the reasons of this trend? What can be done to make cycling more popular? 78
- Every year several languages die out.Some people think that this is notimportant because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.Towhat extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about natural world. 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 595, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
...English because my parent let her learn second language when she was a child. She said...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the best'.
Suggestion: have the best
...rents need to combine simultaneously to have best outcome for children
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eously to have best outcome for children
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21943573668 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66094164723 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554858934169 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6651572937 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6315789474 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366186723625 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112405487427 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106315024157 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225840127005 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769749297657 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.