Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some are increasingly of the opinion that luck is a determining factor to be a successful person. In my view, though there is a compelling reason to support this idea the other parameters indisputably play a key role in achievement.
The majority who advocate in favor of being lucky to succeed point out that the luck measurement serves a significant chance in the whole life path. For instance, in the last half-century, the segment of the population used to be burdened by the idea that the sloly rationale of being prosperity came from the right palm of God’s hand. As a result, if a person had deprived of such chances the global leader, would have engendered a feeling of inadequacy moreover, this led to resentment at that era. To sum up, the intriguing factor to be victorious has been shown as nature luck and this luck validates each person's choice.
Nevertheless, the effect of other prominent parameters is indispensable therefore they should take into consideration through an individual’s successful path. To some extent, hard-working in long-sighted goals and having a passion for grit to achieve are listed as crucial ones. For example, the children who have been thought to set their mind into dreams and pursue their goals are likely to be provided a richer future prospect. However, the primary caregivers, who foster their children in an actual way, are supposed to offer to such kids to have less expectation as well as possessing positive minds through their goals so they will stand out in dealing with an achievement pressure, which may outweigh on them.
In conclusion, although luck contributes greatly to being victorious, I personally opine that there are other inevitable parameters to take into measurement and safeguard the individual achievement Therefore the significance of luck pales in comparison to these factories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-30 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | briona2006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Rosie Holmes | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Rosie Holmes | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | minh phương phạm hồng | 78 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an actual way" with adverb for "actual"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y caregivers, who foster their children in an actual way, are supposed to offer to such kids to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14521452145 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03647940372 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594059405941 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.344831956 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.727272727 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.1818181818 7.06120827912 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143740259089 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549169730994 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398207821672 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853508167574 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198122121085 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.