Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Almost people get their goal by lucky. My point of view, most of reach are got by energetic people. That is the reason why this essay disagrees that everything the rich people get by lucky. First of all, this essay will discuss reach the goal is the procession and then will discuss motivation which help people reach their successful.
To begin with, reach the ambition is the procession. On the thinking of someone, successful of the people is the lucky. However my point of view, gain a success is the procession, because the person who are get their target they spend a lot of thing such as time, trade-off, stressful,etc. The people stand outside cannot see everything of them, as they trust see one side when the person becomes success. Nevertheless, they see part of the procession. Besides, do the aim is not only one day, this is but also day by day. For example, a people open the store and his store is so famous after five years. he is not lucky to get his goal, but he tries to fix his problems and work daily in five years before his store is famous.
On the one hand, the motivation is the most important in success. The newspaper on the internet usually remind motivation of the successful person is the main key, because the person excited and they enjoy their job. Moreover, they can deal with issues and try to follow ambition. For example, the people have the amount of energetic they can deal with their problem and they don’t give up with any problem they met.
On general, the successful people not only own lucky but also, they have the motivation and follow their dream. Goal is the procession and this essay disagree lucky is the main reason of the success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khaihoang | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | nhoxkey200 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | nhoxkey200 | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | coolR | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | bennguyen95 | 84 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy? 73
- Tourism is an ever growing industry. What benefits do you think tourism bring to individuals and society? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... successful of the people is the lucky. However my point of view, gain a success is the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s is the procession, because the person who are get their target they spend a lot of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of things'.
Suggestion: a lot of things
...son who are get their target they spend a lot of thing such as time, trade-off, stressful,etc....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
...thing such as time, trade-off, stressful,etc. The people stand outside cannot see ev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 606, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...is store is so famous after five years. he is not lucky to get his goal, but he tr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, for example, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63366336634 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37735122421 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468646864686 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5674013183 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0736953305154 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269618206358 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.02430196059 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509620572511 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131877987621 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.46 8.58950901804 75% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.