Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argued that luck plays an important role in the achievement of their aims. However, I completely disagree with this opinion.
I believe that only people who work hard achieve success. In other words, what they will be paid-off for a task would deserve how much effort they spend on it. For example, Steven Job's spent thousands of hours coding and experimenting to bring out the great Macintosh operating system that we use nowadays. Another great model is Nick Vujicic, a motivational speaker, who suffered from a rare disorder which resulted in his disabilities. Despite not having any hands and legs, he studied hard to gain degrees, he had his own family and he has been traveling around the world to inspire others.
On the other hand, luck is only a small factor in determining people's achievement. Firstly, to become successful, people can not completely rely on luck. If students only hope to be lucky in the exams and do not study, they will probably fail. Secondly, luck only contributes to short -term fortune. For instance, when a person who wins a lottery is definitely lucky because winning a lottery brings you a ton of money without requiring you do anything to earn it. But he or she can not win the lottery for the rest of his and her life in order to live dependently on this.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that in order to achieve objectives in life, one must be extremely determined and hardworking to follow his or her passion till the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-08 | Huyen Trang | 61 | view |
| 2017-09-08 | Huyen Trang | 61 | view |
| 2017-09-08 | Huyen Trang | 61 | view |
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat. 67
- the charts show the number of marriages and divorces in the USA, 1970-2000 and Marital status of adults Americans, 1970 and 2000. 73
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 73
- the diagrams below give info on transport and car use in Edmonton. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74339622642 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64313696492 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645283018868 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9618297712 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114445632436 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400500371866 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354296468216 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738598455524 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496381022773 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.