Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or not agree?
It is agrued that whether or not some success their target is mostly by a problem of luck. From my point of view, i totally disagree with this notion since lucky is not enough for getting achevements. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearance of modern technology individuals have become smarter and more jeolous, so the conscientious of each person is hugely significant for their development. Not only can citiznes improve graduately their mentality such as academic knowlegde and valuable information, but also this is the fundamental way for getting more improvement. Furthermore, the different question and challenge can be coped by person patiently, being their motivation and inspiration which have numerous benefits. To illustrate, there was a survey by Jessica, the famous scientist and professor which was about the success of consientious adolescence in New York. The statistic showed that nearly everyone has got a various of achevements.
On the other hand, we can not negate the importance of a question of luck for teenagers career. The difficul problem can be dicided more confident. However, lucky is not enough for the development, each young generation should be have their own patient and conscientious and motivation to countribute their abilities for the development of the nation.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay that i mostly disagree with this statement, but it still have strength for the individual life. Parent and each children need to have clear plans to get more improvent in the near future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-28 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 52
- All towns and cities need to have large outdoor public spaces such as parks or squares Do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
It is agrued that whether or not some success their target is mostly by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one has got a various of achevements. On the other hand, we can not negate the...
^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had'?
Suggestion: had
...opment, each young generation should be have their own patient and conscientious and...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es for the development of the nation. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...agree with this statement, but it still have strength for the individual life. Paren...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23846153846 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97679387515 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.444345754 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.769230769 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094450643159 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376518910584 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549123555191 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622861166872 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273058700593 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.