Over the past few years, media has been increasingly influencing people’s routine around the world. Some individuals believe that media moguls also control the behaviours and attitudes of their audience. Unfortunately, a remedy to this situation is tough to come by. Although I partly agree that the media controller controls people’s opinions, I still believe that there is a plausible solution to this.
First, news and media play a pivotal role in our notions about the coming issues. As the conventional way of news reporting is less popular, the online alternative serves the purpose more robustly. Through similar content, media consumers absorb purposeful information differently from each source. For example, BBC News and the New York Times will publicly spread different views of the situation. In short, the media controller maintain the ultimate influence on the audience’s attitude and value.
However, people have access to various sources of news due to advancement in technology. Even though sophisticated algorithms were invented to track users, they can still seek for other media platforms. Especially with a high-technology smartphone, people receive more approach to their interests and worldwide trends. When they realised that one provides unreliable information, they can easily switch to the alternative resource they think is trustworthy. In fact, this can be rectified by deciding whether we can rely on the origin of the information. So, I think it is not difficult to come by the situation.
To sum it all up, it is undeniable that media brokers use their media to manipulate and influence their target audiences. However, this situation can be improved, if the news consumers contemplate the reliability of what they consume. No matter what the owner invents to shape our mindsets, we can overcome that with the practice of thoughtfulness when absorbing information.
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an 69
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both these views and give 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, for example, i think, in fact, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44594594595 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04363206196 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.637781159 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268454316538 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774413572891 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783867902057 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157592940205 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770725392268 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.